What If An Calgary IME Contradicts The Employee’S Doctor’S Findings?

Brief Overview:When a Calgary Independent Medical Examination (IME) contradicts the findings of an employee’s doctor, it can create confusion and raise concerns about the validity of the assessments. In such instances, employers, insurance companies, and legal professionals need to carefully evaluate several factors before coming to a conclusion.

In cases where a Calgary IME contradicts the employee’s doctor’s findings, here are five supporting facts that can help navigate through this situation:

1. Expertise and Objectivity: IMEs are conducted by medical professionals who specialize in assessing disability claims impartially. Their expertise ensures an objective evaluation of the employee’s medical condition.
2. Comprehensive Assessment: Independent medical examiners conduct thorough examinations to gather all relevant information necessary for accurate conclusions. They may review medical records, interview or examine the claimant extensively.
3. Second Opinion: The IME provides an independent second opinion on an individual’s health status or functional abilities when there is disagreement among healthcare providers regarding diagnosis or treatment plans.
4.Decision-Making Considerations: Employers, insurance companies, and legal professionals consider both doctor reports while making decisions pertaining to return-to-work programs and disability benefits.
5.Resolving Disputes: In case of conflicting opinions between doctors’ findings in Alberta workplaces covered under workers’ compensation legislation or collective agreements disputes could be settled with mediation or arbitration.


Q1: Can I ignore the Calgary IME report if it contradicts my employee’s doctor?
A1: While you should not disregard the IME report outright due to its independence and objectivity aspect but considering both perspectives is important for informed decision-making.

Q2: What if I have doubts about the credibility or biasness of either assessment?
A2: It is prudent to seek advice from legal professionals experienced in dealing with workplace disability claims who can provide guidance on how to address credibility concerns effectively.

Q3: How much importance should be given to the IME report?
A3: The significance of the IME report should be considered based on various factors, including its thoroughness, clarity, and consistency with objective medical evidence.

Q4: Can I request further assessments or clarifications in case of contradictory findings?
A4: Yes, you can request additional assessments to gain more clarity if conflicting reports persist. This is especially relevant when making decisions that impact disability benefits or return-to-work plans.

Q5: What are the legal considerations specific to Calgary and Alberta jurisdiction?
A5: Legal practitioners specializing in employment law and workers’ compensation legislation can provide guidance on navigating through legal complexities unique to Calgary and Alberta.

Q6: How do independent medical examiners maintain their objectivity during an assessment?
A6: Independent medical examiners adhere to established guidelines, professional ethics, and standard evaluation protocols to ensure impartiality during examinations.

Q7: Can a reliable consensus be achieved by seeking multiple IMEs from different professionals?
A7. Seeking multiple opinions through additional IMEs may help foster agreement between healthcare providers involved; this might offer a clearer picture for decision-makers contemplating claim-related issues.
When facing contradictory findings between a Calgary IME and an employee’s doctor’s assessment, it is crucial to evaluate all available information objectively. Consultation with qualified professionals experienced in disability management claims will help make informed decisions while ensuring fairness for all parties involved.